Marcello Paros 2024

Civil Society together with Local Government can succeed in protecting the public interest

/
Press Release of the Network for Sustainable Cyclades October 2024
Irreversible overstructure in the CycladesDigitalparos

Petition: Citizens Demand the Protection of the Cycladic Identity

/
The Network for Sustainable Cyclades asks the Municipal Councils of Cyclades to take a stand on these issues and send a letter to the Government asking for their immediate implementation.

Network for Sustainable Cyclades

Founding Declaration

Sifnos 28/10/2023 (1) We, the undersigned, were in Sifnos, coming from different islands of the Cyclades, on the occasion of our participation in the Workshop on: “The fragile, handmade landscape of Sifnos, now in danger!” where we found that we have common views and common anxieties for the future of the unique Cyclades. Considering that we express many more than the present and the present, we decided to join forces for a different, a sustainable future for our islands.

1- The problem:

The natural and built landscape of the Cyclades, which is more than a thousand years old, handmade, unique and fragile, is in imminent danger of permanent and irreversible disappearance of its basic structural characteristics, despite the obligations arising from European legislation, the Florence Convention on Landscape and its incorporation into the existing Greek institutional framework. The Cycladic Islands, which since the 1950s have served as a dream and a haven of peace and authenticity for millions of people from all over the world, are currently threatened by the senseless overexploitation of these unique gifts and the image they have created worldwide through constructions of a different scale and aesthetics. The uncontrolled tourist development and the incompatible building, which in the last decade have been linked to the aggressive penetration of powerful interests in the claim of the Cycladic land in the form of Real Estate and strategic investments, have dramatically increased the pre-existing abandonment of agricultural land. The lack of water resources, the inability to manage waste, traffic and noise, the deterioration of the island landscape, the occupation and degradation of public spaces by single-use plastics, cars, benches and umbrellas, the degradation of marine wealth is a daily reality. How many people can an island finally accommodate, not just without being altered, but to “withstand” the daily pressure of every element of its unique capital, even if its management is dramatically improved? Has the Carrying Capacity already been exceeded, at least on some islands? The continuing anxiety of many of the old and newer residents, workers and entrepreneurs to ensure sufficient income in the short tourist season has led to the expression ‘two months is two months and it will pass’, which reveals the annoyance of more and more of them at the new situation of frantic 24-hour rhythms, where everyone’s working conditions are the first victim. Those who have chosen the islands as their second home are also showing discontent, while more than a few are leaving them. Overtourism is here. Without ignoring the economic, and in some islands, demographic benefits brought by tourism, it seems that this form of monoculture has reached its limits, since the capital (cultural, heritage, natural, social, productive) that allows its (re)production seems to be collapsing. Replacing it with artificial capital of another form – no matter how much the younger settlers of the islands may not have a picture of the past to compare – can hardly have similar results. What is needed today is the planning and management of the natural and built environment, of the available natural resources, the protection and strengthening of the primary sector and the local economy, with a view to the cohesion of local communities and to meeting the challenges of the climate crisis with a view to the sustainability and self-sufficiency of the islands. Tourism development should be just one of the factors to be discussed in the context of a plan for the protection and development of islands.

2- Our options:

In front of us, there are three paths that lead to different outcomes:

  • Path one is business as usual, where we continue to grow by focusing on relaxation and leisure tourism without any spatial or other limitations, with little change from the status quo. However, this path will require new large-scale infrastructure to cope with the overload of existing ones (such as desalination, ports, roads, airports, sewage systems, etc.). Unfortunately, this approach has corresponding consequences, including the inability to comply with the law at all levels. We already see this happening with the occupation of public spaces, illegal buildings, the illegal operation of shops, the destruction of flora and fauna in the sea and on land, etc.
  • Path two is the continued growth of tourism with relative diversification of the dominant product, based on spatial restrictions in real estate (large facilities and scattered building), significant management interventions in traffic, restrictions in resource consumption and waste generation based on the carrying capacity of the islands, and avoidance of over-tourism
  • Path three is a change of the existing development model in favour of another one aiming at sustainability. This new model should not only include an economy that continues to produce but also a more just and cohesive society and a healthy environment. As far as tourism goes, it will always be an important part of the local economy, but not the only one. Therefore, a model should be chosen that takes into account the scale of the islands, the available resources, and the specificity of local communities.This model should offer well-being and wellness for visitors and residents through the promotion of local resources (experience tourism).

3- Our Proposal:

As individuals who understand the pressing need to save the Cycladic landscape and promote the sustainability of our islands, we believe that our efforts should focus on informing, raising awareness, and mobilizing local communities towards the third option: the overthrow of the existing model and the demand for a new one. To accomplish this, we need to shift our priorities from the current practices that have led us to the current situation and adopt principles prioritising sustainable and attractive islands.

Α. For a balanced model of economic and social life aiming at sustainability.

The transformation of the existing development model requires the development of activities that:

  • Focus on soft tourism, which works in harmony with the primary and secondary sectors, and other service activities, to promote a flourishing environment,
  • Protect and enhance the Cycladic physiognomy, which includes the culture, history, architecture, arts, traditions, tastes, aromas, and environment
  • Utilize craftsmen, connoisseurs, and scientists to perform site-specific interventions
  • Disperse visitors over longer periods of the year, reducing the suffocation in summer and the desolation in other months
  • Contribute to climate neutrality

We seek the orientation of the Cyclades towards an economic organization that will not reject tourism, but will choose “slow” and small-scale tourism, not tourism as a monoculture. An economic organisation that will be competitive, not by quantity but by the quality of the products and services produced, incorporating the unique characteristics of each island, while exploiting tradition, skills and new knowledge within the constraints imposed by each island. This will enable entrepreneurs and workers to earn sufficient income with satisfactory working and living conditions and ensure a better quality of life.

Β. For a balanced coexistence of modern island societies with their unique place.

The preservation of the elements of the Cycladic physiognomy requires a change in the management of space and natural resources, especially under the worsening climate crisis. We need spatial planning based on the recognition of the specificity of the vulnerable biodiversity and morphology of the Cycladic landscape, along with the special conditions imposed by the insularity and the already existing situation on the islands, and will offer competitive solutions for economic, social and cultural development of the islands that will not destroy but preserve the island landscape. With particular emphasis:

  • the protection of agricultural land and agricultural production as well as the dry stone terraces (as a monument included in the UNESCO World Heritage List and as a green infrastructure) and the protection of NATURA areas by avoiding any building within their boundaries
  • protection of all man-made elements of the Cycladic landscape (paths, traditional settlements, technical works, traditional Katikies, fountains, agricultural structures, etc.)
  • sustainable maritime spatial planning, protection and restoration of the coastal zone and marine biodiversity, protection/restoration of wetlands
  • the protection of the island landscape from the effects of the climate crisis (erosion, drought, flood risks, heat waves, etc.)
  • the planning and management of energy resources with the aim of climate neutrality, but with care for the protection of the landscape (combined forms of renewable energy, geothermal energy).

But also by policies (state and local) that they will support:

  • local primary and secondary production, preserving, exploiting and highlighting local varieties and the conditions for their continued cultivation,
  • efficient waste and waste water management with the ultimate goal of zero waste,
  • strengthening the self-sufficiency of the islands with maximum support for connectivity and cooperation between them. (The intra-cycladic coastal interconnection plays a crucial role in this respect, alongside a number of other interventions that can support the exchange of products between the islands),
  • protecting water resources and safeguarding the use and distribution of water according to the needs of sustainability, under the control and in the interests of local communities alone,
  • the re-education of all of us, residents and visitors, children, young people and adults, with an emphasis on the education of the youngest, in a new living relationship with the precious landscape in which we are lucky enough to live and come into contact, as well as the historical conditions that led to its formation.

4- Our Action:

We need to act and react immediately. The destructiveness of the current predatory development pattern has already had a severe impact on our islands and the rate of its spread is rapid. Our collective demand must be equally dynamic. We need the active and active participation of all: citizens and institutions, local and national, even European and global, that understand the special importance of our islands. We need formal and informal networks to co-construct and support the hope for safe, sustainable and prosperous Cycladic islands and to ensure active support for our vision and action, especially from the central political subject of any change, which is the islanders themselves. With this declaration we call on all those who agree with our objectives to rally in order to collectively support whatever specific initiatives each of the participants can undertake, in any of the infinite fields that make up our proposal. We are launching the creation of the Network for Sustainable Cyclades.


Signed by those who participated in the meeting of 28 October 2023 in Sifnos, as well as by those (individuals and associations) who joined by submitting the form below. The list of members who have consented to the publication of their names can be found on the“Who We Are” page.


(1) The text was written by the writing team appointed at the meeting of 28 October in Sifnos, consisting of: Tonia Panteleiou, Yannis Spilanis, Nikos Chrysogelos, Eleni Tzirtzilaki, Monica Themou, Alkmeni Paka

If you agree with our declaration and want to become a member of the Network, please fill in your details and submit the following form.

This contact form is deactivated because you refused to accept Google reCaptcha service which is necessary to validate any messages sent by the form.